Publikationen

Recent colorization works implicitly predict the semantic information while learning to colorize black-and-white images. Consequently, the generated color is easier to be overflowed, and the semantic faults are invisible. According to human experience in colorization, our brains first detect and recognize the objects in the photo, then imagine their plausible colors based on many similar objects we have seen in real life, and finally colorize them, as described in Figure 1. In this study, we simulate that human-like action to let our network first learn to understand the photo, then colorize it. Thus, our work can provide plausible colors at a semantic level. Plus, the semantic information predicted from a well-trained model becomes understandable and able to be modified. Additionally, we also prove that Instance Normalization is also a missing ingredient for image colorization, then re-design the inference flow of U-Net to have two streams of data, providing an appropriate way of normalizing the features extracted from the black-and-white image. As a result, our network can provide plausible colors competitive to the typical colorization works for specific objects. Our interactive application is available at https://github.com/minhmanho/semantic-driven_colorization.

Assessing high resolution video quality is usually performed using controlled, defined, and standardized lab tests. This method of acquiring human ratings in a lab environment is time-consuming and may also not reflect the typical viewing conditions. To overcome these disadvantages, crowd testing paradigms have been used for assessing video quality in general. Crowdsourcing-based tests enable a more diverse set of participants and also use a realistic hardware setup and viewing environment of typical users. However, obtaining valid ratings for high-resolution video quality poses several problems. Example issues are that streaming of such high-bandwidth content may not be feasible for some users, or that crowd participants lack an appropriate, high-resolution display device. In this paper, we propose a method to overcome such problems and conduct a crowd test using for higher resolution content by using a 540 p cutout from the center of the original 2160p video. To this aim, we use the videos from Test#1 of the publicly available dataset AVT-VQDB-UHD-1, which contains videos up to a resolution of UHD-1. The quality-labels available from that lab test allow us to compare the results with the crowd test presented in this paper. It is shown that there is a Pearson correlation of 0.96 between the lab and crowd tests and hence such crowd tests can reliably be used for video assessment of higher resolution content. The overall implementation of the crowd test framework and the results are made publicly available for further research and reproducibility1.

Spatial Information (SI) and Temporal Information (TI) are frequently-used metrics to classify the spatiotemporal complexity of video content. However, they are mostly used on original video sources, and their impact on actual encoding efficiency is not known. In this paper, we propose a method to determine the compressibility of video sources, that is, how good video quality can be under a given bitrate constraint. We show how various aggregations of SI and TI correlate with compressibility scores obtained from a public dataset of H.264/HEVCN P9 content. We observe that the minimum TI value as well as an existing criticality metric from the literature are good indicators for compressibility, as judged by subjective ratings as well as VMAF and P.1204.3 objective scores.

Virtual Reality/360˚ videos provide an immersive experience to users. Besides this, 360˚ videos may lead to an undesirable effect when consumed with Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs), referred to as simulator sickness/cybersickness. The Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) is the most widely used questionnaire for the assessment of simulator sickness. Since the SSQ with its 16 questions was not designed for 360˚ video related studies, our research hypothesis in this paper was that it may be simplified to enable more efficient testing for 360˚ video. Hence, we evaluate the SSQ to reduce the number of questions asked from subjects, based on six different previously conducted studies. We derive the reduced set of questions from the SSQ using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for each test. Pearson Correlation is analysed to compare the relation of all obtained reduced questionnaires as well as two further variants of SSQ reported in the literature, namely Virtual Reality Sickness Questionnaire (VRSQ) and Cybersickness Questionnaire (CSQ). Our analysis suggests that a reduced questionnaire with 9 out of 16 questions yields the best agreement with the initial SSQ, with less than 44% of the initial questions. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) shows that the nine symptom-related attributes determined as relevant by PCA also appear to be sufficient to represent the three dimensions resulting from EFA, namely, Uneasiness, Visual Discomfort and Loss of Balance. The simplified version of the SSQ has the potential to be more efficiently used than the initial SSQ for 360˚ video by focusing on the questions that are most relevant for individuals, shortening the required testing time.